The listings featured on this site are from companies from which this site receives compensation. This influences: Appearance, order, and manner in which these listings are presented.
Our videos have over 5 million views on Youtube! Visit our channel now »
Disclosure:
Professional Reviews

vpnMentor contains reviews that are written by our community reviewers. These take into consideration the reviewers’ independent and professional examination of the products/services.

Ownership

vpnMentor was established in 2014 as an independent site reviewing VPN services and covering privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, ZenMate, Private Internet Access, and Intego, which may be reviewed on this website.

Affiliate Commissions Advertising

vpnMentor contains reviews that follow the strict reviewing standards, including ethical standards, that we have adopted. Such standards require that each review will take into consideration the independent, honest and professional examination of the reviewer. That being said, we may earn a commission when a user completes an action using our links, at no additional cost to them. On listicle pages, we rank vendors based on a system that prioritizes the reviewer’s examination of each service, but also considers feedback received from our readers and our commercial agreements with providers.

Reviews Guidelines

The reviews published on vpnMentor are written by community reviewers that examine the products according to our strict reviewing standards. Such standards ensure that each review prioritizes the independent, professional and honest examination of the reviewer, and takes into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings we publish may also take into consideration the affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website.

The ruling party in Israel in primaries election security blunder

Ran Bar-Zik Updated on 2nd July 2023 Software Developer & Mentor

This is an amazing story about how security issues can inflict damage even on old fashioned paper ballot elections.
The Likud is Israel's ruling parties for a couple of years. This is the party of Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister. The Likud's primaries election were held on February 4, Those elections were old fashion - means no voting machines, no web system. Just old, plain, paper ballot thrown to a box. You know the drill.

After the elections, there were some miscalculations, issues, and highly suspicious results. The prime minister ordered recounting of the vote.
The recounting process is also made by hand, but someone needs to count those ballots and after counting the results should be written and aggregated in a computer. This how things are done, we collect the data by hand but write it down in a computer system.
In the middle of the process, one of the reporters got her hand on a picture of the system with the unofficial results.

Voting system
Twitter snapshot, the text says that the recounting is in the process and you can see that the voting is different from the initial count. If you will look closely, you will see that the IP address is visible. I and other Twitter users tried to put this IP in our browsers and… I was surprised to find out that I have full access to the entire recounting system.
Full access to the results FULL access, that's right - not just viewing permission but also access to the editing interface - it means that I could change the recounting results freely.

Full results
Editing interface - fully functional. That's correct, ladies and gentlemen! The system's software engineers made the rather questionable decision of not implementing any access control measures. Consequently, anyone who knew the IP address of the system - and there were numerous individuals in possession of this information - had the ability to manipulate the voting results.

Tampering potential
If even simple access control measures were not installed, what else went wrong in that system? in other systems? Can we believe that no one exploited the recounting process? Does this system was used in the previous counting?

This recounting process is contaminated. The Likud party must hire an external security professional to validate the recounting process.

About the Author

Ran is an experienced Software Developer & Mentor. Specializing in MEAN stack and LAMP stack. Developing modules and plug-ins for WordPress. Extensive knowledge in all client side technologies: JavaScript. HTML and CSS. LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/barzik

Did you like this article? Rate it!
I hated it! I don't really like it It was ok Pretty good! Loved it!
out of 10 - Voted by users
Thank you for your feedback